Pelvic floor rehabilitation for defecation disorders.

Pelvic floor rehabilitation is frequently recommended for defecation disorders, in both constipation and fecal incontinence. However, the lack of patient selection, together with the variety of rehabilitation methods and protocols, often jeopardize the results of this approach, causing difficulty in evaluating outcomes and addressing proper management, and above all, in obtaining scientific evidence for the efficacy of these methods for specific indications. The authors represent different gastroenterological and surgical scientific societies in Italy, and their aim was to identify the indications and agree on treatment protocols for pelvic floor rehabilitation of patients with defecation disorders. This was achieved by means of a modified Delphi method, utilizing a working team (10 members) which developed the statements and a consensus group (15 members, different from the previous ones) which voted twice also suggesting modifications of the statements.

Different perception of chronic constipation between patients and gastroenterologists.

BACKGROUND: There is a certain number of subjects that consider themselves to be constipated (self diagnosed constipation; SDC). The Rome Criteria separate FC from IBS-C, but some SDC patients do not meet the Rome criteria (no Rome Constipation; NRC). Our aims were to evaluate the percentage of SDC subjects with a diagnosis of FC and IBS-C and to compare demographic and clinical features, symptoms, and quality of life in the different SDC groups (FC, IBS-C, NRC). METHODS: During a 2-month period, 934 patients and 980 accompanying persons (AP) were asked to complete a survey. The presence of FC or IBS-C was assessed. SDC subjects were invited to record the stool consistency (Bristol scale) and to fill in the Constipation Severity Index (CSI), obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) and patient assessment of constipation-quality of life (PAC-QoL). The use of laxatives and enemas was evaluated. KEY RESULTS: The probability of the ROME III criteria being present was higher in SDC compared with no-SDC (OR 20.5). NRC was present in 13.5% of the SDC. In the patients' group the agreement between a diagnosis of Rome III and SDC was good (K 0.62), whereas in the AP it was moderate (K 0.56). NRC showed lower mean values of ODS, CSI and PAC-QoL, higher Bristol scale and a lower use of laxatives and enemas compared to IBS-C and FC. No differences were found between IBS-C and FC. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The Rome III criteria identify subjects with a greater clinical impact, but separation of FC and IBS-C does not seem justified.

Self-perceived normality in defecation habits.

BACKGROUND: Available information on normal bowel habits was mainly gathered by means of telephone interviews or mailed questionnaires. AIMS: We undertook a prospective study to evaluate the defecatory habits in subjects perceiving themselves as normal concerning this function. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire (4-week diary with "yes-no" daily answers to six questions concerning bowel habits) was distributed to 204 subjects perceiving their defecation behaviour as normal. RESULTS: The completed questionnaire was returned by 140 subjects. No significant differences were found between sexes or age groups for any variable, even though straining at stool and feeling of incomplete and/or difficult evacuation showed a trend to increase with age. No subject had less than three bowel movements per week or more than three per day. The percentage of symptoms linked to an abnormal defecatory behaviour was well below 10%. Fifty-five percent of subjects reported at least one parameter of abnormal functioning; the most frequent was straining at stool and the rarer was the manual manoeuvres to help defecation. CONCLUSIONS: In normal subjects the prevalence of symptoms considered in Rome II criteria as part of an abnormal defecatory behaviour (in more than 25% of defecations) is well below 10%, manual manoeuvres are almost never used to help defecation, and the frequency of defecations is at least three per week.

Pelvic floor dyssynergia and psychiatric disorders. Does the snake bite its tail?

AIM: Psychological and/or psychiatric disorders (PSY) and functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) are often linked. Pelvic floor dyssynergia (PFD) is one of the most frequent FGID, but few studies have investigated its possible relationship with PSY. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether an increased prevalence of PSY, and of what types, exist in patients affected with PFD. METHODS: Thirty-four female patients PFD and 34 age- and gender-matched control subjects were evaluated. The prevalence rates of axis I psychiatric disorders (DSM IV) and of pathological temperaments (Schneider-Akiskal criteria) were determined. RESULTS: PSY were detected in 29 patients (85.3%) and in 11 controls (32.3%), (p=0.000). A family load was present in 7 patients (20.6%) and in 2 controls (5.9%), (NS). Sixteen patients (47.0%) and no control subjects were diagnosed as having axis I psychiatric disorders (p=0.000); anxiety disorders were the most frequently represented condition. A pathological temperament was found in 28 patients (82.3%) (primarily the phobic-anxious temperament) and in 11 control subjects (32.3%),(p=0.000). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is a higher prevalence of PSY in PFD patients than in controls in particular, anxiety disorders and the phobic-anxious temperament. We would recommend that a psychiatric evaluation be carried out in patients with PFD, especially before starting rehabilitation therapy for obstructed defecation, as the presence of psychiatric disorders could alter the course and decrease the efficacy of such a rehabilitation program.

Gastric emptying in myotonic dystrophic patients.

BACKGROUND: Myotonic dystrophy is often associated with digestive symptoms that can precede the clinical appearance of skeletal muscle involvement. Although motility disorders may be observed in these patients at any level of the gastrointestinal tract, upper gastrointestinal symptoms have up to now usually been considered to be due to oesophageal rather than gastric dysmotility. AIMS: To evaluate: a) gastric emptying in myotonic dystrophic patients without dyspeptic symptoms, and b) relationship between gastric emptying and severity and duration of the disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gastric emptying was evaluated in 11 non-dyspeptic dystrophic patients and in 22 healthy volunteers by means of computerised ultrasound scan, assessing the variation in the antral area over time after ingestion of a meal. RESULTS: The final emptying time was higher in patients than in healthy volunteers (373' +/- 35' vs 270' +/- 47'; p < 0.001). Basal and maximal post-prandial antral areas were similar in the two groups. There was a significant correlation between gastric emptying and the duration of the disease (rs = 0.62; p = 0.04). No relationship was found between gastric emptying and severity of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric emptying may be abnormally delayed in myotonic dystrophy patients, even in absence of dyspeptic symptoms. This delay is correlated with duration but not with severity of the disease. However there is no difference in either basal or maximal postprandial antral areas between myotonic dystrophy patients and healthy volunteers.